CHAPTER
TWO
Cosmos II
Cosmos acts; we act, we act within Cosmos, Cosmos acts within us. As stated
before already, again we stress that our Acts and Action can be expressed,
in symbols, in sounds, in words, in language. All these are not thinking,
not thought. They are what they are: Acts, Actions, Actitudes, Práxis.
Words and Language are only vehicles, only tools, to express Cosmos. They
can also be used for Thinking or Thought, for EINAI; but also for Surpassing,
Superating and Transcending, for Nihil, Nada, NOTHING. Also, note here that
Nothing does not mean "absence of something": There is nothing in my beer
glass. There is nothing in the house. You will disappear into nothingness.
Nothing can be done for you. Later this Transcept (not Concept) "Nothing"
will be elucidated.
Before we advance to more complex avenues, ventures and adventures, let
us focus on the everyday practical and praxical aspects of this philosophical
endeavour, that concerns Cosmos.
Simple a n d Complex AND Vague
It is reminiscential to note that in another context, we stated certain
philosophic, analytic logical rules (in reality, relations): simple relations
and affirmations (levels) are to be explained precisely, id est, simply; complex
concatenations and negations (degrees) exist intricately, and they presuppose
intellectual difficulties; vague, frontierlike superations (mensions) are
excellent to reason, but they demand limitless (apeironic) transcendental
efforts.
In brief: What is simple has to be elaborated as such; what is complex
has to be explained in a similar manner; what is opaque can only be approached
in a vague fashion; mixing up these rules will certainly end up with the
superstructural ideological chaos we enjoy nowadays in nearly all our means
of social communication, and it can cause fatal mental derangement, which
is the essence of Zombization on a world scale.
Having highlighted the above, now we can continue with "affirmative action",
giving simple examples and explanations of our unilogical manner of approaching
the Cosmos, and therewith Nature at large, our "natural habitat", and later,
Praxis and Science.
Cosmos Acts
We remarked previously that Cosmos acts in itself, that Cosmos acts in
us, that we act in ourselves, and that we act within Cosmos itself. We also
stated that Cosmos can self-reflect its own Action, for example, the mirror
reflection of snow-capped Pico Bolivar in its own Andean lagoon below. Whether
Pico Bolivar "knows" this, or whether we "see" this with our eyes, or with
our mind, are topics for the next part, concerning Negation, Einai.
At least, the Hegelian World Spirit objectivates itself in its own Absolute
Mirror, and in this "Vergegenständlichung", in this "Entäusserung",
later called "Entfremdung", Alienation, in this Auto-Reflection of itself,
it can cognize, can recognize itself; not as mirror reflection, but as Itself-In-Itself,
as Weltgeist-An-Sich.
WE ACT
Similarly, we, -- "human beings", cosmic beings (not existences, not thinking
existences), acting beings, -- self-reflect ourselves-in-our-selves and
in Cosmos-In-Itself. This is our Relation, our Bezug, our and-Bezug, our
Action, our Praxis. In-It-Self is an and-Bezug, it has no extensive relations;
it only "relates" itself. We express our Cosmic in-it-self relation, our
natural-self-relation, not by means of "work" or "labour" but via our acts,
our actions within Cosmos, within Nature. This is the difference between
our conception of "Act or Action or Praxis" and the general connotation
of "work or labour" used in Marxist or non-Marxist literature and education.
The Patrian natural or cosmic relation is dualistic, aggressive, dominating
and exploitative; ours is simply a cosmic natural relation-in-it-self, with
no pro's or con's about it.
ACT,THOUGHT: EXPRESSED IN WORDS, IN LANGUAGE
Also, we have stated previously, that Doing and Thinking are not identical,
and, as such, they cannot be expressed the same way; furthermore, they refer
to different things, to different relations. Many Patrian philosophers have
underlined the various degrees of Thinking and Thought, for example Kant
and Hegel; some have distinguished the various " degrees" of Being, of Consciousness
(Bloch), and they did this via the tool Language which is composed of words
and other symbolic expressions. Again, formal logically, a Tool is a Tool
(Law of Non-Contradiction); a Thought is a Thought, an Idea is an Idea. No
Tools are Ideas, and no Thoughts are Tools; but a tool (language) can be
used for Action, for Ideas, for Thoughts, to explain divine transcendental
events in the Biblical Apocalypse!
Hence, we have to differentiate
when we use words and language: that is, to know whether we express Action
or Thought or Transcendence. The same language and alphabet are used, but
not necessarily the same words and expressions. We cannot use chaotic terms
to expound levels (Action), degrees (Thought) and mensions (Excellence).
This is the pot-pourri and sancocho we spoke about earlier. We use language
to express Action; we use certain words and expressions; we use Unilogic,
and our basic terms are Percepts (not Concepts). For example, we use Essence
and its verb "is", or we use "and" in Unilogic, expressing Cosmic Action;
we do not use Existence, and its verb "exists" or "a n d " in Unilogic, because
they pertain to Dialogic, to Diagories, to Concepts, to Ontic Thought, to
Einai.
The Relation (Bezug)
Furthermore, concerning Relation (Bezug), which becomes relevant in the
next part, just some introductory remarks. The Percepts (not Concepts) which
denote the Cosmos at rest, and which describe its intensive motion, its
repose, its multiplicity, its poli-universality, are methodologically identified
as Unigories (not Categories), and they compound the essence of our Unilogical
Method, our Unilogic. Cosmos perceives itself unigorically, unilogically;
it is its own Self-Reflection, Selbst-Bezug, Non-Relation.
The Bezug itself has levels (and), degrees (a n d ), and mensions (AND).
Also, we know a multiplicity of cosmic non-relations; however, we should
note that non-relation denotes precisely what it is, a non-relation; there
are all sorts of Relations: uni-relations, hemi-relations, semi-relations,
multi-relations, non-relations, etc. Also, it becomes obvious, that for us,
Science, essentially, pertains to Acts, Actions and Praxis, not to Work or
Labour, although it includes them in its relations, as non-relations. Science
is natural, is Natural Science, is Cosmic Science, is Cosmoscience.
