CHAPTER
EIGHT
TOWARDS NOTHING
What follows now was acted, thought and transcended for over a decade,
hence, we do not expect you to follow immediately. However, practice makes
perfect, thus, take your time, eventually you will grasp the scientific
a n d philosophic gist of all this. Until now, it follows that we have discussed,
that we have thought Einai-in-itself, its Sätze, its Percepts; in a
nut-shell, we expounded the Affirmation of Einai, i.e., Einai-itself.
STEP 5
As next philosophic step, we have to advance to analyse the following:
Einai-for-It-self, that is, Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-Itself.
Definitively, in the "Information Age", in the "Third Millennium", here
we have to ask for super-concentration, for precise ultra-thinking and mega-thought!
Based on all that we explained till now, kindly note the following:
Einai-in-itself has a non-relation to Einai-for-itself;
Einai-for-itself exists related to Einai-in-itself;
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself, as Satz a n d Gegensatz, extensively,
is non-related a n d exists related to Nothing; however, Nothing transcends,
excels, superates neither Einai-in-itself nor Einai-for-itself.
THIS IS WRITTEN AS FOLLOWS:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing, or,
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself AND Nothing.
Just remember, "Cosmos and Einai" is identified as Einai-in-itself, and,
differentiated "Cosmos a n d Einai"exists as Einai-in- a n d -for-itself.
We are learning to act in, a n d to think for ourselves!
-----oOo-----
OUR SCIENCE a n d PHILOSOPHY
A Simple Approximation
by Franz J. T. Lee
12th June, 2002
6. TRIALOGICS - NOTHING - PART I
HOW TO LEARN TO EXCEL OF, BY AND FOR OURSELVES
The Relation (Bezug)
TOWARDS NOTHING
We are moving on towards the most complicated, complex, vague and opaque
parts of our New Science a n d Philosophy, but also towards the most interesting
and undiscovered realms, where till now no noble philosophic eagles ever
dared to fly, where the gaping abyss of Chaos and Nothing and where the Almighty
God were blocking the entrances to poliversal knowledge and wisdom. And,
as we said, opaque frontierlike knowledge should be depicted with vague wisdom,
only as such with real marks(wo)manship we strike the "Pudelskern" (Dr. Faustus).
Accompanying the Ancient Greek Wise Man, Bias of Priene, and also Gorgias,
the Sophist, let's advance with our own, new, original authentic Science
a n d Philosophy AND Wisdom.
You would recollect that in the previous part, we stated:
"As next philosophic step, we have to advance to analyse the following:
Einai-for-It-self, that is, Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-Itself."
... That is:
Its Non-Relations, Relations and Neithernor Bezüge to NOTHING, and
vice versa.
"Hence:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing, or,
Einai-in-itself a n d Einai-for-itself AND Nothing."
However, in this section, we'll just present the fundamental elements,
that are urgently necessary to embark safely, sane and sound, on our immense,
philosophic, transhistoric express; thus, inexorably continuing our innovative
voyage, towards the exotic, evergreen, unknown pastures of our third postulate,
towards Nothing. However, refreshing our ontic memory, basically, let us recollect
what we have already stipulated about our orgonic Relations, about our translogical
Bezüge:
"Furthermore, concerning the Relation (Bezug), which becomes relevant
in the next part, just some introductory remarks.
"The Percepts (not Concepts) which denote the Cosmos at rest, and which
describe its intensive motion, its repose, its multiplicity, its poli-universality
are methodologically identified as Unigories (not Categories), and they compound
the essence of our Unilogical Method, our Unilogics. Cosmos perceives itself
unigorically, unilogically; it is its own Self-Reflection, Selbst-Bezug,
Non-Relation.
"The Bezug itself has levels (and), degrees ( a n d ), and mensions (AND).
"Also, we know a multiplicity of cosmic non-relations; however, we should
note that non-relation denotes precisely what it is, a non-relation; there
are all sorts of Relations: uni-relations, hemi-relations, semi-relations,
multi-relations, non-relations, etc.
Also, it becomes obvious, that for us Science essentially pertains to
Acts, Actions and Praxis, not to Work or Labour, although it includes them
in its relations, as non-relations. Science is natural, is Natural Science,
is Cosmic Science, is Cosmoscience. "
Now let us look at the illustrations at the top of this page.
The first illustration, above, shows the constituent postulates and the
Bezüge of NOTHING, that is: [ Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing ] .
The third one shows all the primary Bezüge of our Trialogical Method,
in fact, our Logical Method itself, also demonstrating the spheric Bezug
of Nothing itself: [ "and" a n d "a n d " AND "AND" ].
Note, we are not landing in a "black hole"; on the contrary, we comfortably
sail through a "white hole", seeing bright, orgonic, cuatrifferent light
at the end of the black, alienating, universal tunnel, henceforth, navigating
into other, other-other and another-other spheres.
"AND" is our trialogical Neithernor Method, that enables this trialogical,
transcendental leap into Nothing, into Nowhere, Nowhen, Nohow, Nowhy, Nowhither,
etc.; the preliminary, emancipatory, historic basics of all these, we will
illustrate carefully step-by-step in the next section.
Meanwhile, we can just say that it is our logical process from Thought
towards Excellence, and it crosses the current, formal-logical, dialectical,
universal Rubicon as Emancipation, as History, as Nothing-itself.
However, let us arm ourselves with our invisible, invincible, invulnerable
methodological tools.
In Unilogics, as Sätze, we elucidated the following:
Non-Relation, Relation, Bezug; in other words, we identified: and, a
n d , AND.
As Gegensätze: they exist in:
Dialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d ";
Trialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d "; "and" a n d "AND";
"a n d " a n d "AND".
As Entgegensatz: it transcends in:
Trialogics as: "and" a n d "a n d" AND "AND".
Again, before we explain the Entgegensatz, in the next section, in the
previous illustration look for yourself how this surpasses:
Triagories
In Unilogics, we analyse anything, using exclusively Unigories, Percepts,
for example: Cosmos, Einai, Theory, Deed, Nothing, etc.
Our Logical Method uses the Non-Relation.
In Dialogics, that exists as Unilogics a n d Dialogics, we think exclusively
within the realm of Diagories, that exist as Unigories a n d Diagories,
in Concepts, that exist as Percepts a n d Concepts, for example, Cosmos,
Einai, Theory, Deed, Nothing, Cosmos a n d Einai, Deed a n d Thought, Nature
a n d Society, Praxis a n d Theory, etc.
In Trialogics, that excels as Unilogics a n d Dialogics AND Trialogics,
we transcend with all the above, and more, with Triagories, that surpass
as Unigories a n d Diagories AND Triagories, expressed in Percepts a
n d Concepts AND Transcepts, as example:
Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing,
Deed a n d Thought AND Excel,
Nature a n d Society AND History,
Objectives a n d Subjectives AND Transjectives,
Beauty a n d Truth AND Love,
Affirmation a n d Negation AND Superation,
Minimum a n d Maximum AND Zillimum, etc.
So, don't forget, Nothing excels as neitherCosmosnorEinai; thus, as we
will see, Excellence presupposes not a dialectical "Double Negation" but a
trialogical "Triple Superation". As from now, we are acting, thinking and
excelling -- a sane and healthy brain can accomplish all these without any
cognitive difficulties, can non-relate, relate and neither non-relate nor
relate as it pleases now. Fasten your seat-belts, we accelerate now, we excel
in Trialogical Modus. And this has nothing to do with "doublethink", parallel-think
or even with only thinking of any genre alone.
Till now, we were non-relating a n d relating; now neither non-relate
nor relate will have its turn.
